 |
|
Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt > Shoshenq II Shoshenq II
Heqakheperre Shoshenq II was an Egyptian king of the 22nd Dynasty of Egypt. He was the only ruler of this Dynasty whose tomb was not plundered by tomb robbers. His final resting place was discovered within Psusennes I's tomb at Tanis by Pierre Montet in March 1939. It contained a large number of jewel-encrusted bracelets and pectorals, along with a beautiful hawkheaded silver coffin and a gold facemask. Montet later discovered the intact tombs of two Dynasty 21 kings, Psusennes I and Amenemope in February and April 1940 respectively. Shoshenq II's prenomen, Heqakheperre Setepenre, means "The Manifestation of Re rules, Chosen of Re." Our knowledge of King Shoshenq II, though a very obscure king, is an excellent example of both ongoing controversies and problems related to references in Egyptology. While his life is much under debate amongst specific scholarly circles, references often make clear cut statements that defy those underlying debates without referencing other likly possibilities. The discovery in the Delta City of Tanis of a series of rich kingly tombs of the 21st and 22nd Dynasties by the French Egyptologist Pierre Montet should have captured the imagination of the world, but they did not. Europe was on the brink of war, and in no mood for such news at the time. He had stumbled inadvertently upon a veritable necropolis of Third Intermediate Period kings.
Montet's recorded reaction to his entry into one of these, on March 17th, 1939, may have lacked originality, "a day of marvels worthy of the Thousand and One Nights", but it was appropriate enough. Dropping gingerly through the roof, the decorated chamber would prove to be the tomb of King Psusennes I. There, he was surrounded by veritable heaps of burial equipment, including much that belonged to, at that time, an unknown king by the name of Heqakheperre Shoshenq (II). Even today, we know very little about Shoshenq II. His birth name and epithet were Shoshenq (meryamun), meaning Shoshenq, Beloved of Amun. Heqa-kheper-re Setep-en-re, meaning "The Manifestation of Re rules, Chosen of Re" was his Throne name. He was a member of the Libyan, or Bubastite Dynasty (22nd Dynasty). Most current references refer to Shoshenq II as the son of Osorkon I and state that he became the High Priest of Amun at Karnak (probably 924-894 BC) prior to being made a co-regent of his father in about 890 BC. He was probably about 50 years of age at this time. His mother was perhaps Maatkare, according to a statue of the personification of the Inundation that was dedicated by Shoshenq II. Shoeshonq II may have married a lady named Nesitanebetashru and another named Nesitaudjatakhet. Some scholars believe that he may have at least fathered a child (known as Osorkon D) who would also become a High Priest of Amun, though this is certainly not clear. Another child, Harsiese, if he indeed was a child of Sheshenq II, became king of Thebes. Egyptologists are divided on whether Shoshenq II ever became an independent ruler. Most English references will advocate that he never became an independent ruler, but this brings up an interesting point about Egyptology. It was Kenneth Kitchen, the English Egyptologist who asserts that Shoshenq II was never an independent ruler, based on evidence from mummy bandages. He relies on the bandages found on the mummy of Nakhtefmut that relate Year 33 of Osorkon's rule with Year 3 of an unknown ruler. Kitchen believed that the unknown ruler was none other than Shoshenq II. However, these two dates were not written on a single piece of bandage, but on two separate ones, and there is no particular evidence that the two bandages were actually from the same period of time. Other examples exist where bandages were used that did in fact date to different periods. On the other hand, several non English Egyptologists appear to believe that Shoshenq II in fact did have an independent reign of at least several years. For example the German Egyptologist, Von Beckerath, makes this claim in his 1997 German language book, Chronology of the Egyptian Pharaohs, based upon the absence of dated monuments from his reign. However, because it is a German book, this theory has not much been introduced into the English press. It should also be noted that Manetho states that there were three kings within the interval between the reigns of Osorkon I and Takelot I. There is also some disagreement as to whether Shoshenq II was the son of Osorkon I. Some have argued, based on the lack of inscribed items bearing the name of Osorkon I in the funerary equipment of Shoshenq II, and the presence of items bearing the name of Shoshenq I, that it was the latter who fathered Shoshenq II. Indeed, if Shoshenq II was not the son of Osorkon I, he may probably also not have been a High Priest of Amun, nor would he have had a child named Harsiese who became king of Thebes. In the end, not much is as clear about Shoshenq II as Kitchen makes it seem. There are many ongoing disagreements amongst Egyptologists. After the mummy's discovery, it was sent to Douglas Derry in the Anatomy Department of the Cairo University's Facility of Medicine. He noted that water had entered the coffin, since the bones of the mummy's legs were covered with tiny rootlets that had penetrated the coffin where it was broken at the foot. All of the soft tissue was gone. The examination revealed that the brain had been removed from the skull and the roof of the nose had probably been broken for that purpose. An analysis of his mummy revealed that the cause of death was probably an injury to the head which developed into a massive infection. King Shoshenq II died of septic infection. Regrettably, dampness destroyed almost everything that wasn't metal or bone in the tomb where Shoshenq II was discovered. However, we are left with a few priceless relics, including his silver coffin, jewelry, including some very fine pectorals and a few other items. The coffin was similar in style to that of Tutankhamun's gold one, but had a falcon's head rather than the face of the king. Beneath the coffin, the mummy wore a gold mask. There were also four miniature silver coffins used to hold the king's internal organs, a considerable variation from most previous canopic equipment. Editor's note: I would like to thank Fabian Boudville of Canada for considerable help in sorting out the ongoing research into this king. His references and analysis were a very important part of the story. |
Mysteries Zone Network: For everyone who enjoys a mystery stories. Feel free link to any page(s) from this site. NOTE: Views expressed here are not endorsed by mysterieszone.com or any other sponsoring individuals or organizations. 2010 copyright by Mysteries Zone Resources, Privacy Policy |
