mysteries zone

Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt > Shoshenq I

Shoshenq I

Shoshenq I's cartonnage coffin
King Shoshenq I's cartonnage coffin from Tanis now in the Cairo Museum.

Hedjkheperre Setepenre Shoshenq I (Egyptian ssnq), also known as Shishak, Sheshonk or Shoshenq I (for discussion of the spelling, see Shoshenq), was a Meshwesh Libyan king of ancient Egypt and founder of the Twenty-Second Dynasty. Shoshenq I was the son of Nimlot A, Great Chief of the Ma, and his wife Tentshepeh A, a daughter of a Great Chief of the Ma herself. The majority of Egyptologists, including Kenneth Kitchen and Aidan Dodson, believe he is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible as ?????? Sîsaq (transliterated as Shishaq and Shishak) though this identification has been questioned by David Rohl, Peter James, and other adherents of the so-called New Chronology.

Chronology

The conventional dates for his reign as established by Kenneth Kitchen are 945 - 924 BC but his time-line has recently been revised downwards by a few years to 943-922 BC since he may well have lived for up to 2 to 3 Years after his successful 925 BC campaign against Israel and Judah rather than Kitchen's estimate of only 1 Year. As Edward Wente of the University of Chicago noted on page 276 of his JNES 35(1976) Book Review of Kitchen's study of the Third Intermediate Period, there is "no certainty" that Shoshenq's 925 BC campaign terminated just prior to this king's death a year later in 924 BC. The English Egyptologist, Morris Bierbrier also dated Shoshenq I's accession "between 945-940 BC" in his seminal 1975 book concerning the geneaologies of Egyptian officials who served during the late New Kingdom and Third Intermediate Period. Bierbrier based his opinion on Biblical evidence collated by W. Albright in a BASOR 130 paper. This development would also account for the mostly unfinished state of decorations of Shoshenq's building projects at the Great Temple of Karnak where only scenes of the king's Palestinian military campaign are fully carved. Building materials would first have had to be extracted and architectural planning performed for his great monumental projects here. Such activities usually took up to a year to complete before work was even begun. This would imply that Shoshenq I likely lived for a period in excess of one year after his 925 BC campaign and that his 945 BC accession date could be slightly lowered to 943 BC. In addition, the Monthly fractions of the reigns of the previous seven Pharaohs of the 21st Dynasty may total up to a Year since Manetho's Epitome merely records their individual reigns at a set number of 'X' Years and completely ignores the monthly figures. Such an adjustment would also have the effect of shifting Shoshenq I's accession date forward in time from 945 BC.

The most recent and comprehensive study of Ancient Egyptian chronology affirms the theory that Shoshenq I came to power in 943 BC rather than 945 BC as is conventionally assumed based on epigraphic evidence from the Great Dakhla stela which can be dated to Year 5 of his reign. The editors of the 2006 book 'Ancient Egyptian Chronology' write:

"The chronology of early Dyn. 22 depends on dead reckoning. The sum of the highest attested regnal dates for Osorkon II, Takelot I, Osorkon I, and Shoshenq I, added to 841 BC as year 1 of Shoshenq III, yields 938 BC at the latest for year 1 of Shoshenq I. However, the large Dakhla stela provides a lunar date in the form of a wrs feast in year 5 of Shoshenq I, yielding 943 BC as his year 1."

For rather obvious reasons, the 22nd Dynasty is known as the Libyan or Bubastite Dynasty. All the kings of this period are listed by Manetho as being from Bubastis, a city located in the eastern Nile Delta, and their Libyan origin is evident in the founder's name, Sheshonq I (Shoshenq I). They ruled Egypt for about 200 years, beginning in 945 BC.

It was a rare occurrence for an outside military power to simply conquer Egypt, and the Libyan takeover of the country was no exception. When foreign rule of Egypt took place, it was almost always by elements who had settled in the country and it was Bubastis that the Libyans eventually dominated, creating a seat of power that would rise up to control the Two Lands. Shoshenq I was not the first Libyan to at least rule a part of Egypt, and in fact, many other Libyan names appear in official capacities before him. By the end of the ancient Egypt's New Kingdom, Libyans may have made up a majority of the Egyptian army, and by this time, Libyans constituted a substantial and influential presence in Egypt.

To a certain extent, referring to the Libyans as foreign rulers of Egypt must be put into some prospective. For example, hardly anyone would say that, during the 1960s, the Irish took control of the United States, even though John Kennedy, who was of Irish decent with an obvious Irish name became president. His family had lived in the United States for many years, just as Shoshenq I's family had lived in Egypt for generations. It is likely that Shoshenq I considered himself just as much Egyptian as John Kennedy considered himself American, though perhaps both recognized their heritage.

King Shoshenq was actually the son-in-law of his predecessor, Psusennes II (though some references provide that it was his son, Osorkon I, who married Psusennes II's daughter named Maatkara), and a nephew of Osorkon the elder. He had, prior to ascending the throne, the strength of the Egyptian military behind him as commander-in-chief of all the armies and was also a trusted adviser to Psusennes II. He was noted in the Theban records as "Great Chief of the Meshwesh", who originally were recruited from Libyan tribes as essentially an internal police force.

Like his predecessors, and even the Greeks who would follow him in the not so distant future, he adopted the royal Egyptian titles as his own. He choose to associate himself with the king named Smendes I from the previous dynasty, basing his titles on those of that former ruler. His birth name, Shoshenq I, and epithet (meryamun) translate as "Shoshenq, Beloved of Amun. His throne name was Hedj-kheper-re Setep-en-re, meaning "Bright is the Manifestation of Re, Chosen of Re".

Burial

He was succeeded by his son Osorkon I after a reign of 21 Years. According to the British Egyptologist Aidan Dodson, no trace has yet been found of the tomb of Shoshenq I; the sole funerary object which can be linked to Shoshenq I is a canopic chest of unknown provenance which was donated to the Ägyptisches Museum Berlin (ÄMB 11000) by Julius Isaac in 1891. This may perhaps indicate that his tomb was looted in antiquity but this hypothesis cannot be proven at present. Egyptologists differ over the location of Shoshenq I's burial and speculate that he may have been buried somewhere in Tanis, perhaps in one of the Anonymous royal tombs here or in Bubastis. However, Troy Sagrillo in a GM 205 (2005) paper observes that "there are only a bare handful of inscribed blocks from Tanis which may possibly name the king (ie: Shoshenq I) and none of these come from an in situ building complex contemporary with his reign." Hence, it is more probable that Shoshenq was buried in another city in the Egyptian Delta. Sagrillo offers a specific location for Shoshenq's burial--the Ptah temple enclosure of Memphis and notes that this king built:

"fairly widely in the area, undoubtedly including a pylon and forecourt at the Ptah temple (Kitchen, TIPE 1996, pp.149-150)...It is, therefore, not completely improbable that he (ie: Shoshenq I) built his tomb in the region. The funerary cult surrounding his 'House of Millions of Years of Shoshenq, Beloved of Amun' was functioning several generations after its establishment at the temple (Ibrahem Aly Sayed 1996, p.14). The 'House of Millions of Years of Shoshenq, Beloved of Amun' was probably the forecourt and pylon of the Ptah temple which, if the royal necropoleis at Tanis, Saïs, and Mendes are taken as models, could very well have contained a royal burial within it or the temenos."

Sagrillo concludes by observing that if Shoshenq I's burial place was located at Memphis, "it would go far in explaining why this king's funerary cult lasted for some time at the site after his death."

While Shoshenq's tomb is currently unknown, the burial of one of his prominent state officials at Thebes, the Third Prophet of Amun Djedptahiufankh, was discovered intact in Tomb DB320 in the 19th Century. Inscriptions on Djedptahiufankh's Mummy bandages show that he died in or after Year 11 of this king. His Mummy was discovered to contain various gold bracellets, amulets and precious carnelian objects and give a small hint of the vast treasures which would have adorned Shoshenq I's tomb.

Shoshenq I was known as a strong ruler who once again brought together a divided Egypt, which had been fragmented between Thebes in the South and Tanis in the north. Hence, his reign is seen as a highpoint in the otherwise bleak Third Intermediate Period. He was responsible for incorporating his sons into various high offices that allowed him to exercise specific control over important regions of the country.

His son, Iuput, became Governor of Upper Egypt, High Priest of Amun and commander-in-chief of the armies, which had the effect of uniting secular and religious elements within the empire. At the same time another son named Djedptahaufankh was able to support his brother as Third Prophet of Amun, while yet another son, Nimlot, became military commander at Herakleopolis. Herakleoplis was near Thebes and this military base could keep that important region in check. He also appointed a chief of an allied Libyan tribe named Nesy as fourth prophet of Amun. Loyalty to the throne was also encouraged by allowing powerful locals to marry the daughters of the royal court. Hence, Shoshenq I created a stable power base at home, which allowed him, after having put down a small disturbance in the Dakhla Oasis, to turn his attention towards the old Egyptian Near Eastern holdings.

After the death of Solomon in 930 BC, Judah was under the control of Rehoboam (Solomon's son), while Israel was ruled by Jeroboam I, and both of these kingdoms were attractive prospects for the new Egyptian ruler. Apparently, Jeroboam I had led an open rebellion against Solomon before his death, weakening both kingdoms. Shoshenq, known in the Hebrew Bible as Shishak, defeated both in 925 BC during a very successful campaign. In fact, one would have to look back to the reign of Ramesses III in Egypt's 20th Dynasty to find an equal to this victorious expedition. The expedition opened with an engagement in the area of Bitter Lakes against Bedouins. Afterwards, he went first against Judah, setting out from Gaza with 1,200 chariots and an army that included Libyans and Nubians. He penetrated some distance into the Negev, capturing the principal towns of Judah before he arriving at the walls of Jerusalem. He surrounded the city but was bought off by being given, according to 1 Kings 14:26, "the treasures of the house of the Lord, and the treasures of the King's house; he even took away all: and he took away all the shields of gold which Solomon had made". Apparently, the only treasure that Rehoboam was able to retain was the most sacred Ark of the Covenant. Now, Shoshenq I turned his attention to Israel, forcing Jeroboam, who had once been under Shoshenq I's protection, to flee over the Jordan River. He was nevertheless captured by an Egyptian patrol. Shoshenq finally halted at Megiddo, which had been conquered by Thutmose III 500 years before.

There, he erected a victory stele in the manner of his predecessors before marching southwards over Mount Carmel and returning to Egypt by way of Ashkelon and Gaza.

He likewise inscribed his success on the walls of the Temple of Amun at Thebes (modern Luxor). He reopened the sandstone quarries at Gebel el-Silsila for building material so that Iuput, as High Priest of Amun could build a great new court (the Babastite Portal) before the Second Pylon at Karnak. Its south outer wall was decorated with a huge relief of Shoshenq I's victories, provided through the grace of Amun. From his inscriptions at Karnak, we find at a list of cities effected by his military campaign in the Levant. Those that can be somewhat identified include:

From a statue of Shoshenq I discovered in the sanctuary of the goddess Baalat-Gebal at Byblos, it also appears that this pharaoh also had a good relationship with King Abibaal. Most scholars believe that this was due to economic trade, rather than any military actions, and apparently he also established trade relationships with others in the Levant.

Notably, it was during the reign of Shoshenq I, while his son Iuput was at Thebes, that many of the royal mummies in the Valley of the Kings were moved to a cache in a arge gallery just south of Deir el-Bahari, which had a few years earlier been adapted as the tomb of the late High Priest Pinudjem II.

Unfortunately for Shoshenq I, his life ended in about 924 BC, soon after the Palestinian campaigns, and with it, Egypt's new found success in the Levant. Most scholars believe that he was buried with his ancestors in the group of royal tombs at Tanis, though no specific grave has ever been discovered. He may have even been buried in his native town of Bubastis. His mummy was encased in a cartonnage and a sliver coffin, both having Horus falcon heads to identify the king with Osiris-Sokar. The only item of Shoshenq I's funerary equipment that has been unearthed is a canopic Chest, which seemed to have been modeled on an earlier 18th or 19th Dynasty type. Regrettably, this artifact first appeared on the antiquities market and there was no information on the location where it was discovered.

He was succeed by a son named Osorkon I, but he was honored by four other kings of the 22nd and 23rd Dynasty who also took his name.


Egyptian Hebrew English
rwbAty rbyt Rabbith
tAankA tank Taanakh
SAnmA Swnm Shunem
bAtySnrA bytSAn Beth Shan
rwHAbAA rHwb Rehob
HApwrwmA Hprym Hapharaim
mHAnm mHnym Machanaim
qbAaAnA gbawn Gibeon
bAtyHwArwn byt Hwrwn Beth Horon
Aywrwn Aylwn Ajalon
mkdyw mgdw Megiddo
ywdhmrwk ydhmlk
aArAnA arn Aruna
DAdptTrw zdpt Al ?
sAywkA Skh Socoh
AdmA AdmA ?
DArwmAm
yrwDAA Yeraza
AdrAA Adr Adar
aArwdA ard Arad
anprwn ayn prn Ayn Paran
hAm